FieldHockeyCorner.com

2006 Ratings as of November 19, 1:45 pm
by Ratings Percentage Index (RPI)

Division 3

South Atlantic

Great Lakes  NE East  NE West  North Atlantic  South South Atlantic   All

RankTeamRecord1ACR2RPI3SOS4
1Messiah17-5 99.60.6940.667
2TCNJ16-3 99.70.6660.607
3Lebanon Valley19-3 99.40.6640.598
4Rowan15-6 98.60.6510.630
5Montclair State16-3 99.00.6320.562
6Elizabethtown16-6 98.10.6160.579
7Juniata16-5 98.00.6160.567
8Eastern16-5 97.30.5930.536
9Widener13-5 97.80.5860.541
10Alvernia18-5 97.40.5820.516
11King's19-4 97.70.5690.483
12William Paterson12-7 97.00.5660.544
13FDU13-8 96.30.5520.529
14Susquehanna5-12 95.70.5360.617
15Kean9-7 96.70.5350.526
16Wesley13-9 95.90.5350.516
17Misericordia12-7 95.70.5240.488
18Scranton11-9 96.60.5220.513
19DeSales9-9 95.60.5170.523
20Wilkes9-8 95.70.5150.510
21Richard Stockton7-11 95.50.5140.556
22Ramapo7-10 95.40.5110.545
23Philadelphia Bible9-10 95.20.4990.508
24Neumann8-10 94.80.4910.507
25Delaware Valley10-8 95.50.4840.461
26Moravian4-15 94.40.4810.571
27Stevens11-8 95.20.4750.440
28Drew3-13 94.20.4680.562
29Albright6-12 94.70.4620.505
30Cabrini7-9 94.00.4570.463
31Gwynedd-Mercy7-11 94.10.4420.460
32Manhattanville3-16 93.90.4380.531
33Marywood5-11 93.10.4130.447
34Arcadia3-14 92.50.4120.490
35Immaculata4-13 92.30.3890.441
36Saint Vincent3-11 91.50.3780.432
37Cedar Crest2-15 91.40.3770.464
38Rosemont0-12 89.50.3270.436

1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here.  The same holds true for the three ratings described below.

2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses

3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25 * team's record + 0.50 * opponent's record + 0.25 * opponent's-opponent's record

4Strength of Schedule = (2/3) * opponent's record + (1/3) * opponent's-opponent's record

Notes
  • Click the column headers to sort the table by that field (in descending order for ratings and alphabetically for teams).


  • In the case of opponent's record in RPI and SOS, games involving the target team have been removed.


  • These calculations are provided only for entertainment purposes.  The SOS and ACR have no bearing on selection to the NCAA, while the NCAA's official RPI will be produced and published in October and November.


  • Formulas are constant across schools, allowing comparisons to be valid.


Home